home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=91TT0793>
- <title>
- Apr. 15, 1991: The Presidency
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
- Apr. 15, 1991 Saddam's Latest Victims
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- NATION, Page 35
- THE PRESIDENCY
- What Links These Six?
- </hdr><body>
- <p>By Hugh Sidey
- </p>
- <p> Ronald Reagan may still be a triumphant and beloved
- figure to the American people, but the historians who evaluate
- presidential performance have consigned him to the cellar. In
- the first significant measure of his standing, scholars have
- rated Reagan "below average"--down with five other
- mediocrities such as Millard Fillmore and Franklin Pierce.
- </p>
- <p> Nearly 500 of the nation's top history professors
- responded to the Murray-Blessing update survey on presidential
- performance. They placed Reagan 28th on a list that includes 37
- of the 40 U.S. Presidents. William Henry Harrison, who died
- after a month in office, and James Garfield, assassinated after
- six months, were not ranked. George Bush, still at work, is not
- eligible.
- </p>
- <p> With six categories available, ranging from "great"
- (Lincoln, Washington, Jefferson, F.D.R.) to "failure" (Andrew
- Johnson, Buchanan, Nixon, Grant, Harding), Reagan was placed in
- the the next-to-last group. Reagan was outranked by Jimmy Carter
- and Jerry Ford ("average") and topped only Nixon of the modern
- Presidents.
- </p>
- <p> The rating of Presidents has been serious business since
- Harvard's Arthur Schlesinger Sr. made an informal tally among
- 50 colleagues in 1948. In 1981 Robert Murray (now retired) and
- Tim Blessing of Pennsylvania State University took up where
- Schlesinger left off. This week Blessing will walk bravely into
- a meeting of the Organization of American Historians in
- Louisville and deliver a paper on the new poll results. Reagan
- partisans will start to climb the walls.
- </p>
- <p> The historians gave Reagan low marks on nearly everything,
- from his mind (92% said he did not have the right intellect for
- the job) to Administration corruption (exceeded only by Nixon's
- government). He got little credit for ushering in a new era of
- prosperity but received most of the blame for the deficits and
- the 1981-82 recession.
- </p>
- <p> On foreign affairs, the rating was mixed. The scholars
- found Reagan's Middle East policy "a record of ineptitude" but
- applauded his handling of relations with the Soviet Union.
- Oddly, the academics approved of Reagan's style of management
- and believed he had a rare knack for "getting people to follow
- him where he wanted to go." Plainly, few of the professors liked
- where he went.
- </p>
- <p> Such a harsh and inclusive indictment will raise further
- questions about the partisanship and competence of the
- historians as well as about Reagan. Their judgments are
- strikingly out of phase with those of the electorate. "A
- crushing 91.8% of historians believe that the American people
- have overestimated Mr. Reagan," writes Blessing. Put another
- way, the scholars think that the plain folks did not quite
- understand what was going on.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-